Justice Mohammed Idris,
in a judgment on Thursday, held that Olanusi’s suit was an abuse of court
processes, noting that the reliefs being sought were same as those in an
earlier suit marked Ak/51/2015 still pending before an Ondo State High Court in
Akure.
“The issues of the
fundamental rights of the applicant were raised in that suit as in this suit.
This cannot be allowed.
“The institution of the
first action between the main parties or even similar parties on same subject
matter simultaneously when the previous suit has not been disposed off
constitutes an abuse of court processes.
“I therefore hold that
this suit is filed in abuse of court processes in the light of suit numbered
AK/51/2015,” Idris held.
The judge also held that
he had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit and went on to fault the joining
of the Inspector General of Police as a defendant, who, he said, played no role
in Olanusi’s impeachment.
Idris upheld the
submission by the Attorney General of Ondo State, Mr. Eyitayo Jegede (SAN), who
represented the first respondent in the suit, that “it is clear that the
applicant merely joined the Inspector General of Police as a subterfuge to
justify bringing this application before this court in an obvious situation of
lack of jurisdiction.
“Making the Inspector
General of Police as a respondent against all grains cannot salvage the
situation.”
Idris, however, rejected
Jegede’s argument that Olanusi filed his suit in breach of Order X Rule 1 of
the fundamental rights enforcement procedure 2009.
Olanusi, who was
impeached on April 27, 2015, had sued the IG and the chairman of the seven-man investigative panel which found him
guilty of impeachable offences, Mr. Olatunji Adeniyan.
In his suit, which was
transferred from the Akure Division of the Federal High Court to the Lagos
Division, so that it could be urgently heard, Olanusi contended that the
Adeniyan-led panel breached his fundamental right to fair hearing.
His lawyer, Mr. Olukoya
Ogungbeje, claimed that “the sitting, conclusion of proceedings and submission
of report by the panel within one day” denied Olanusi his right to fair hearing
as enshrined in Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution.
Olanusi claimed that the
impeachment panel did not give him adequate time and facility to defend himself
against the allegations of misconduct which he was found guilty of.
He also alleged that the
Adeniyan-led panel failed to personally serve him with the notice of the
allegation of misconduct before proceeding into hearing and reaching its verdict.
He therefore sought an
order quashing the proceedings and the report of the Adeniyan-led seven-man
impeachment panel which recommended him for impeachment.
He also sought an order
nullifying his removal as the Ondo State Deputy Governor by the state House of
Assembly on April 27, 2015.
But Adeniyan, through the
Attorney General of Ondo State, Jegede,
filed a notice of preliminary objection, urging the court to
discountenance Olanusi and strike out his suit.
Jegede, who described
Olanusi’s suit as an abuse of court processes, said the ex-deputy governor
goofed by approaching the court through a fundamental right enforcement
application to challenge his impeachment.
No comments:
Post a Comment